Holding XRP on an exchange leaves the private keys outside your control, while moving it to a hardware wallet adds a setup decision that can be harder than it looks. The right device should support XRP, keep signing credentials away from ordinary online threats, and make recovery practical if a card or device disappears.
Our Best Cold Wallet for XRP picks range from simple tap-to-phone cards to a full air-gapped device with a large transaction screen. TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 is the one we would choose first for most XRP holders, with ELLIPAL Titan 2.0, Arculus, D'CENT, and the other card-based options covering different security and backup priorities.
Comparison table
| # | Product | Award | Security | Connection | Support | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 | Best overall | EAL6+ secure chip | NFC tap, no Bluetooth or USB | 90 blockchains, 14, 100+ coins and tokens | Most XRP holders |
| 2 | Arculus Wallet Black | Best three-factor card | CC EAL6+ secure element | NFC tap | XRP and other major assets | Layered authentication |
| 3 | ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 | Best air-gapped wallet | Fully offline secure design | QR codes | 10, 000+ tokens, up to 5 accounts | Detailed transaction review |
| 4 | ELLIPAL X Card | Best card for existing wallets | EAL6+ secure chip | NFC tap, no USB or Bluetooth | 40+ blockchains, 10, 000+ tokens | Importing an existing wallet |
| 5 | TANGEM Wallet Pack of 3 | Best backup flexibility | EAL6+ secure chip | NFC tap, no Bluetooth or USB | 90 blockchains, 14, 100+ coins and tokens | Multiple recovery cards |
| 6 | ELLIPAL X Card Pack of 3 | Best X Card backup set | EAL6+ secure chip | NFC tap, no USB or Bluetooth | 40+ blockchains, 10, 000+ tokens | Card-based redundancy |
| 7 | Arculus Wallet Silver | Best minimalist metal card | CC EAL6+ secure element | NFC tap | Supports XRP and major assets | Simple offline storage |
| 8 | D'CENT Biometric Wallet | Best biometric wallet | EAL5+ secure element | Bluetooth | 4, 900+ assets, 100+ blockchains | Mobile Web3 access |
| 9 | ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 Golden | Best air-gapped alternative | Fully offline secure design | QR codes | 10, 000+ tokens, up to 5 accounts | Large-screen cold storage |
| 10 | Arculus Wallet XRP | Best XRP-focused Arculus option | CC EAL6+ secure element | NFC tap | XRP and major assets | XRP-first card storage |
1. TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2: Best Overall

Pros
- EAL6+ secure chip keeps private keys inside the card
- No battery, cable, Bluetooth connection, or setup-heavy desktop process
- Supports 90 blockchains and 14, 100+ coins and tokens
- Waterproof and shockproof design
- Second card provides a practical backup
Cons
- Phone is still required for management
- Tap-based workflow gives less on-device transaction detail
- Seed phrase recovery is optional rather than the only recovery method
Best for: XRP holders who want a simple card wallet with a built-in backup.
The appeal of TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 is that it removes nearly every piece of hardware friction. There is no battery to charge, no USB cable to keep nearby, and no Bluetooth pairing step. You tap the card to a phone to manage the wallet, which makes the device feel closer to carrying a secure access card than operating a small computer.
Its EAL6+ secure chip is the important security detail. The private keys remain inside the chip, while the phone acts as the interface for buying, selling, swapping, staking, and other wallet actions. TANGEM says the cards cover 90 blockchains and more than 14, 100 coins and tokens, giving XRP plenty of room alongside other assets. That breadth matters if your portfolio extends beyond the XRP Ledger.
The second card is more useful than a generic spare because the product is designed around backup cards. TANGEM says one card can restore access if the other is lost, and advanced users can use an optional seed phrase. Its stated IP69K water resistance, shock protection, and operating range from minus 25°C to 50°C also make the card easier to store outside a desk drawer.
The compromise is visibility. Unlike ELLIPAL Titan 2.0, this TANGEM does not give you a large screen for inspecting transaction details directly on the device. You also need the phone app for normal management. Readers who want the strongest separation from a phone should look at the ELLIPAL options, while anyone who wants a more approachable tap-to-use setup should stay with TANGEM.
For a broader look at how card wallets compare with other hardware designs, the trade-offs between different cold storage approaches are worth understanding before you initialize one. For most XRP holders, the two-card TANGEM combination is the easiest balance of broad asset support, physical durability, and recovery planning.
2. Arculus Wallet Black: Best Three-Factor Card

Pros
- Combines biometric authentication, a six-digit PIN, and the physical card
- CC EAL6+ secure element
- NFC transactions require no cable or internet connection
- Supports XRP and other major cryptocurrencies
- Card format is easy to store discreetly
Cons
- Asset coverage is described broadly rather than with a specific token count
- Phone app remains central to everyday management
- No onboard screen for transaction inspection
Best for: users who want several authentication layers in a credit-card-style wallet.
Arculus Wallet Black takes a different route from TANGEM. Its headline feature is three-factor authentication: a biometric lock, a six-digit PIN, and the Arculus metal card containing the encrypted private key. That means an attacker would need more than access to a phone or knowledge of a PIN to use the wallet.
The card communicates with the phone through NFC. There are no cords, Bluetooth connections, or internet connections involved in the card-to-phone interaction. The CC EAL6+ secure element is another strong point, placing the keys in a certified chip rather than in the phone that runs the Arculus app.
For XRP buyers, the supported-asset description is reassuring. Arculus specifically names XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Cardano, Litecoin, and Polkadot, and says the wallet supports 95 percent of cryptocurrency market capitalization. That wording is not the same as a fixed list of 10, 000-plus tokens, so buyers with less common assets should confirm support before transferring funds.
The card's simplicity is also its limitation. There is no display on the device, so the phone handles the visual side of sending and swapping. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 is better for someone who wants transaction information shown on a dedicated screen, while Arculus is less intimidating for a newcomer who values authentication layers over a larger hardware interface.
The black card is the strongest Arculus pick in this list because its distinguishing feature is the security workflow, not its finish. Anyone who wants a thin wallet, NFC operation, and a three-part unlock process will find a clear reason to choose it. Someone who needs large token coverage or card-based redundancy should consider TANGEM or ELLIPAL X Card instead.
3. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0: Best Air-Gapped Wallet

Pros
- No Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB, or network cable connection
- QR-code transaction signing keeps the device offline
- Four-inch HD screen makes transaction details easier to inspect
- Supports more than 10, 000 tokens
- Supports up to five separate accounts
Cons
- Larger and less pocket-friendly than the card wallets
- QR signing takes more steps than an NFC tap
- More hardware than casual XRP holders may need
Best for: long-term holders who want strong network isolation and clear transaction review.
The ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 is the most serious security design in this group. It is fully air-gapped, with no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or network cable connection. Instead, the phone app and the wallet exchange transaction information through QR codes. That adds a few seconds and a few scans to the process, but it also keeps the signing device separated from network-level attacks.
The four-inch HD screen is its biggest practical advantage. The product description says the Titan 2.0 shows who is being paid, how much is being sent, and which smart contracts are being authorized. For XRP transfers, that larger view makes address and amount checking less dependent on a phone screen. It is a meaningful upgrade over TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 and Arculus Wallet Black, neither of which has a display on the card.
ELLIPAL lists support for more than 10, 000 tokens and says the Titan 2.0 can manage up to five separate accounts. Those accounts can be used to separate daily activity, long-term holdings, trading funds, or family funds. The device pairs with the ELLIPAL app for buying, selling, swapping, sending, and earning rewards across supported assets.
The downside is the ritual. QR-code signing is not as immediate as tapping a TANGEM or Arculus card to a phone. The hardware is also much larger than a card, and its extra screen and offline architecture make most sense when you hold enough crypto to care deeply about reviewing every authorization. New users who mainly want to store XRP and rarely transact may prefer a simpler card.
ELLIPAL states an eight-year record without security breaches and says the wallet is used in more than 140 countries. Those claims are company supplied, so the more concrete buying reason is the architecture: the Titan 2.0 offers a fully offline signing device, broad support, and enough screen space to reduce blind signing. It is the one to choose when isolation and transaction visibility outrank convenience.
4. ELLIPAL X Card: Best Card for Existing Wallets

Pros
- EAL6+ chip stores private keys away from the phone
- Works without a battery, USB, Bluetooth, or firmware updates
- Can import a compatible recovery phrase
- Supports 40-plus blockchains and 10, 000-plus tokens
- Compact NFC card design
Cons
- No display for checking a transaction on the card
- Recovery phrase import requires careful handling
- One card offers less redundancy than a multi-card set
Best for: users who already have a compatible wallet and want a physical backup card.
ELLIPAL X Card has one feature that separates it from most of the other card wallets here: it can serve as a physical twin of an existing compatible wallet. ELLIPAL says the card can import a recovery phrase from MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Ledger, Trezor, or another compatible seed phrase wallet. That lets an owner protect an existing account without starting over or transferring assets to a new address.
The setup is designed to be quick. ELLIPAL says the offline starter device can be ready in three minutes, after which the card taps to the mobile app. The X Card has no battery, does not require charging, and does not use USB or Bluetooth. Private keys are generated and stored inside an EAL6+ secure chip, so the phone is used for management rather than key storage.
Asset coverage is broad, with support for more than 40 blockchains and 10, 000-plus tokens. XRP is named directly in the product title, and the app supports buying, selling, swapping, sending, spending, and earning across supported networks. That combination makes the X Card more than a static vault, though its convenience also means users need to stay alert when approving transactions in the app.
Compared with TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2, the X Card has a stronger case for someone who already owns a wallet and wants to preserve its existing recovery setup. TANGEM is the cleaner choice for starting from scratch with card backups. Neither card has the dedicated transaction screen of ELLIPAL Titan 2.0, so readers who want on-device confirmation should skip both.
This is a particularly sensible choice for an XRP holder who has built a wallet elsewhere and wants a compact offline backup. Treat the recovery phrase as highly sensitive during import, and do not photograph or casually store it. The X Card is strongest when its backup role matches the way you already manage your assets.
5. TANGEM Wallet Pack of 3: Best Backup Flexibility

Pros
- Three-card recovery arrangement
- EAL6+ secure chip
- No battery, USB, or Bluetooth
- Supports 90 blockchains and 14, 100-plus coins and tokens
- IP69K water resistance and shock protection
Cons
- Still relies on a phone app
- No screen for direct transaction checks
- More cards to store and document securely
Best for: households or long-term holders who want several physically separate backup locations.
The TANGEM Wallet Pack of 3 is the same basic card system as the two-card version, but the extra card changes the recovery plan. One can stay with you, one can be stored in a secure location, and another can be held elsewhere. That separation is useful for anyone thinking about fire, theft, travel, or shared household access.
The cards use an EAL6+ secure chip, and TANGEM says the private keys remain locked inside it. Management happens through a phone tap, with no battery, cable, or Bluetooth connection. XRP support sits within the stated 90-blockchain and 14, 100-plus coin and token coverage, leaving plenty of space for a broader portfolio.
TANGEM also says the cards are waterproof to IP69K, shockproof, and tested from minus 25°C to 50°C. Those claims do not remove the need for careful storage, but they do make the card format less fragile than a screen-equipped device. The claimed lifespan of up to 25 years is another reason this pack suits people planning for long-term custody.
The drawbacks match those of the two-card pack. Transaction review takes place through the phone, and the card itself cannot show the recipient or amount. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 is a better fit for deliberate QR-based signing, while Arculus Wallet Black is better if biometric authentication and a PIN are central to your plan.
Choose the three-card TANGEM when redundancy is the deciding factor. It is not the most informative wallet to operate, but it is easy to understand, easy to distribute across safe locations, and unusually broad in stated asset coverage. For an XRP holder building a physical recovery plan, the third card has a clear purpose.
6. ELLIPAL X Card Pack of 3: Best X Card Backup Set

Pros
- Three-card redundancy
- EAL6+ secure chip
- No battery, USB, or Bluetooth
- Supports more than 10, 000 tokens
- Can replicate a compatible existing wallet
Cons
- No transaction display
- Recovery phrase import requires careful operational security
- Three cards are unnecessary for users who need only one backup
Best for: users who want the X Card design with several physically separate copies.
ELLIPAL X Card Pack of 3 makes the most sense when the cards are going to live in different places. The three-card arrangement provides more flexibility than the single X Card, particularly for someone who wants a primary card, a secure backup, and a third copy stored away from the first two.
Each card uses an EAL6+ secure chip and keeps the private keys away from the phone, app, USB, Bluetooth, and internet. ELLIPAL says the X Card works across more than 40 blockchains and 10, 000-plus tokens, with XRP named among the supported assets. The app handles ordinary actions such as sending, swapping, and staking where supported.
Its standout feature remains the ability to import a compatible recovery phrase. That makes this pack more interesting for existing wallet owners than TANGEM Wallet Pack of 3, which is more naturally set up as a new card-based wallet. If your current wallet is compatible, the X Card can function as a physical counterpart without requiring an asset transfer.
The cards do not solve the visual verification problem. There is no hardware screen, so you cannot inspect a transaction on the card itself. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 is the better choice for detailed review before signing, and D'CENT Biometric Wallet is more suitable if you want a device with a screen and direct mobile connectivity.
This pack is best for a user with a clear backup policy, not someone buying three cards without deciding where they will go. Store the cards separately and protect any recovery information with the same care as the assets themselves. If you already use a compatible software or hardware wallet, the X Card pack provides a practical path to card-based redundancy.
7. Arculus Wallet Silver: Best Minimalist Metal Card

Pros
- Three-factor authentication
- CC EAL6+ secure element
- NFC tap-to-transact operation
- No cords or internet connection required for card communication
- Thin metal card format
Cons
- No dedicated display
- No backup card included
- Supported assets are broad but not expressed as a fixed token count
Best for: users who want a thin card and layered authentication without a larger device.
The Arculus Wallet Silver is functionally the same Arculus design as the black version, but it earns a place here for readers who prefer the alternate finish and the same credit-card-style form. Its central idea is simple: the physical card, a six-digit PIN, and biometric authentication work together as the three factors needed to access the wallet.
Arculus uses a CC EAL6+ secure element to protect the private key on the card. Transactions are passed to the phone by NFC, without a cable or a Bluetooth link. The app provides the management layer for sending, receiving, and swapping supported assets, while the card remains the physical object required for the workflow.
The product description specifically lists XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Cardano, Litecoin, and Polkadot. It also says the wallet supports 95 percent of cryptocurrency market capitalization. That should cover the major assets most XRP buyers hold, but users with obscure tokens should verify support instead of assuming the headline percentage covers every asset they own.
Arculus Silver is less flexible as a backup system than either TANGEM pack or ELLIPAL X Card Pack of 3 because this listing is for one card. It also gives you no screen for checking the details of a transaction. The trade-off is a compact device with a clear authentication story, and that can be more appealing than carrying a small screen-equipped wallet.
Pick this version when a thin metal card and three-factor access matter more than broad published token counts or multiple recovery cards. Skip it if you want air-gapped QR signing, extensive account separation, or a dedicated screen. For straightforward XRP storage, it remains a clean and restrained design.
8. D'CENT Biometric Wallet: Best Biometric Wallet

Pros
- Fingerprint authentication
- EAL5+ secure element
- Bluetooth mobile connection
- Supports 4, 900-plus assets across 100-plus blockchains
- Four-button interface and screen
- MetaMask and dapp access
Cons
- Bluetooth-connected workflow is less isolated than ELLIPAL Titan 2.0
- EAL5+ is a lower certification level than the EAL6+ cards
- More device interaction than a tap-only card
Best for: active XRP users who want biometric access, a screen, and mobile Web3 features.
D'CENT Biometric Wallet is the most feature-rich alternative to the card designs. It uses fingerprint authentication, a four-button interface, and a screen, so it feels like a small standalone hardware device rather than a passive card. That makes it a better fit for users who regularly interact with their wallet instead of placing XRP into storage and leaving it alone.
Its private keys are kept offline on an EAL5+ certified secure element. The device pairs with the D'CENT mobile app over Bluetooth, where users can manage tokens, review transactions, and access in-app swaps. XRP is named directly, and D'CENT lists more than 4, 900 assets across more than 100 blockchains, along with support for stablecoins, NFTs, and other major networks.
The screen and four-button interface provide a useful middle ground. You get more direct device interaction than with TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 or Arculus Wallet Black, but you do not get the fully air-gapped design of ELLIPAL Titan 2.0. D'CENT also connects to MetaMask and other browser extension wallets for NFTs, airdrops, and dapps.
Bluetooth is the major security and workflow distinction. It does not automatically make the wallet unsuitable, but users who specifically want no wireless connection should choose ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 or one of the NFC cards. The EAL5+ secure element is also a lower stated certification level than the EAL6+ chips used by TANGEM, Arculus, and ELLIPAL X Card.
D'CENT adds a useful scam protection feature through Blockaid, which checks contract addresses against known scam databases before signing or swapping. That is relevant for active Web3 users, though no automated warning should replace reading a transaction carefully. Choose D'CENT if you want fingerprint access and broader dapp interaction. For XRP holders who want quiet long-term storage, its extra capabilities may be unnecessary.
9. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 Golden: Best Air-Gapped Alternative

Pros
- Fully offline operation
- QR-code transaction signing
- Four-inch HD screen
- Supports more than 10, 000 tokens
- Up to five separate accounts
Cons
- Larger than the card wallets
- QR workflow is slower than NFC tapping
- The main distinction from the other Titan is the finish
Best for: buyers who want Titan 2.0 capabilities in the alternate finish shown here.
The ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 Golden is the alternate-finish version of the Titan 2.0 design. Its security and workflow are the same: no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or network cable, with QR codes used to move unsigned and signed transaction information between the wallet and phone app.
The four-inch HD screen is the reason to choose a Titan over a card. The device is intended to show the recipient, amount, and smart-contract authorization in readable form before signing. That helps reduce blind approval, particularly when a transaction contains more than a straightforward XRP transfer.
ELLIPAL lists more than 10, 000 tokens and support for up to five separate accounts. The ELLIPAL app adds buying, selling, swapping, sending, and rewards features across supported assets. XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, NFTs, and other assets are named in the product description, so the wallet is designed for a portfolio rather than a single coin.
The compromises are familiar. QR scans add a deliberate step to every transaction, and the device is not as easy to carry or hide as an NFC card. D'CENT Biometric Wallet offers a more active Bluetooth experience, while the standard ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 offers the same core architecture without this listing's alternate finish. The Golden version should be selected for preference, not because it changes the security model.
This is a strong fit for someone who has already decided that air-gapped signing matters and wants a large screen. It is excessive for a holder who only needs a backup card, but it gives long-term XRP storage a more inspectable and structured workflow than the smaller options.
10. Arculus Wallet XRP: Best XRP-Focused Arculus Option

Pros
- XRP is specifically named in the listing
- Biometric, PIN, and physical-card authentication
- CC EAL6+ secure element
- NFC tap-to-transact design
- Credit-card-style storage
Cons
- No screen on the card
- One card does not provide built-in redundancy
- The product is less suitable for obscure assets without support checks
Best for: XRP holders who want the Arculus authentication system with XRP highlighted directly.
The Arculus Wallet XRP is the most directly targeted Arculus listing in this group. It uses the same core card concept as Arculus Wallet Black and Arculus Wallet Silver, but XRP is called out in the product title and feature description. That makes the intended use especially clear for someone buying a wallet primarily for XRP.
The security arrangement has three parts: biometric authentication, a six-digit PIN, and the physical Arculus card. The card stores the private key in a CC EAL6+ secure element, while NFC handles the tap-to-transact connection with the phone. There is no cable or Bluetooth pairing step in the card's communication workflow.
Arculus says the wallet covers 95 percent of cryptocurrency market capitalization and names XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Cardano, Litecoin, and Polkadot. Those are useful signals for a mainstream portfolio, but the same caution applies as with the other Arculus listings. If you plan to store a less common token alongside XRP, check that the app supports it before moving funds.
The lack of a screen keeps the wallet thin, but it also means the phone is where you inspect transactions. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 is the better option for a fully offline device with a large signing display. TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 is more compelling for buyers who want a second physical recovery card included from the start.
Choose Arculus Wallet XRP if the combination of an XRP-forward listing, three-factor authentication, and NFC convenience matches your priorities. It is not the most versatile or redundant option here, but it is a focused card wallet for a mainstream XRP holder who wants a physical authentication step.

How to choose best cold wallet for xrp
The right wallet depends on how often you transact, how much visibility you want before signing, and how carefully you can manage backups. XRP support is essential, but the recovery method and connection design matter just as much.
XRP and asset support
A wallet should name XRP directly or provide a clear supported-asset list that includes it. TANGEM lists 90 blockchains and more than 14, 100 coins and tokens, while ELLIPAL X Card lists 40-plus blockchains and more than 10, 000 tokens. Arculus names XRP among major supported assets but describes coverage more broadly.
Do not treat a large headline number as proof that every token or network is supported. Check the exact asset and the app used to manage it before transferring funds.
Key storage and secure element
The secure element is where the wallet protects private keys from ordinary software access. TANGEM, Arculus, and ELLIPAL X Card list EAL6+ chips, while D'CENT lists an EAL5+ secure element. These certifications are useful indicators of hardware security, but they do not replace safe recovery practices or careful transaction approval.
A wallet can have strong hardware and still be compromised by a careless recovery phrase, a malicious app, or an address copied incorrectly. Keep the recovery information private and verify every transfer.
The safest XRP wallet is the one whose recovery method you can explain before you need it.
Connection method
NFC cards such as TANGEM, Arculus, and ELLIPAL X Card use a tap-to-phone workflow. It is quick and avoids USB and Bluetooth, but the phone remains the visual and operational interface. D'CENT uses Bluetooth, which supports a richer mobile experience but does not provide the same network separation as an air-gapped wallet.
ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 uses QR codes and has no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or network cable. That is the strongest isolation in this group, though each transaction takes more deliberate steps.
Transaction visibility
A dedicated screen lets you inspect the recipient, amount, and authorization details on the hardware itself. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 is the clear standout here, while D'CENT also has a screen and four-button interface. The card wallets rely on the phone app.
For occasional XRP storage, a card may be perfectly practical. For frequent transfers, dapp use, or smart-contract approvals, a screen can make suspicious details easier to catch.
Backup and recovery
TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2 and TANGEM Wallet Pack of 3 are built around backup cards. ELLIPAL X Card Pack of 3 provides the same general advantage for the X Card system, while the single-card listings require a separate recovery plan.
A three-card pack is useful only if the cards are stored separately and documented properly. Do not place every copy in the same drawer, and do not keep recovery details in an ordinary photo library or cloud note.

Frequently asked questions
Which wallet in this list supports XRP?
All 10 listed products are presented as supporting XRP or as part of a product family whose feature description names XRP. TANGEM and ELLIPAL advertise especially broad multi-asset coverage. Arculus and D'CENT also specifically name XRP in their supported-asset descriptions.
Is an air-gapped wallet better for XRP?
An air-gapped wallet provides stronger network separation because ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 does not use Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB, or network cables. It is a good fit for users who prioritize offline signing and detailed transaction review. The trade-off is a slower QR-code workflow compared with tapping a card to a phone.
Do these wallets store XRP on the device?
The wallet does not hold XRP in the same way a physical container holds cash. The assets remain on their blockchain, while the hardware wallet protects the private keys used to authorize transactions. Losing a device does not necessarily mean losing access if the recovery method has been secured correctly.
Is a card wallet or screen wallet easier to use?
A card wallet is usually simpler for quick phone-based management because it has no battery, cable, or desktop connection. A screen wallet takes more space and can require QR scans, but it gives you more direct transaction information before signing. The choice comes down to convenience versus inspection and isolation.
How many backup cards should an XRP holder keep?
The answer depends on the recovery plan, not on a universal number. A two-card or three-card pack can let you store copies in separate secure locations, but every extra copy must be protected. Multiple cards do not help if they are all stored together or if the recovery process has not been tested.
Does D'CENT support XRP and NFTs?
D'CENT lists XRP, NFTs, and more than 4, 900 assets across more than 100 blockchains. It also supports MetaMask and other browser extension wallets for dapps and Web3 activity. Buyers should still confirm support for any specific asset or application they plan to use.

The bottom line
The Best Cold Wallet for XRP for most people is TANGEM Wallet Pack of 2. Its EAL6+ chip, broad stated asset support, no-battery NFC workflow, and second backup card make it straightforward to use without giving up a sensible recovery option.
Choose ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 if you want the strongest network isolation and a large screen for reviewing transactions, or choose D'CENT Biometric Wallet if fingerprint access, Bluetooth, and active Web3 features matter more. Arculus is the better fit for three-factor card authentication, while ELLIPAL X Card is especially useful for importing a compatible existing wallet.
If you are undecided, choose the wallet whose backup process you will actually follow, then verify XRP support before transferring anything.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.